The statement expresses strong opposition to a proposed digital ID scheme, suggesting it is part of a broader surveillance agenda. It uses charged language, such as 'totalitarian' and 'deep state,' to convey distrust and fear. The statement implies a conspiracy, which may not be substantiated by evidence, and could contribute to public fear and misunderstanding.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement may cause harm by spreading fear and potentially unfounded conspiracy theories.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals it accuses, potentially engaging in cyberbullying or harassment.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division and fear.
[-2]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.It does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks and ad hominem arguments.
[-2]