In reply to:
Cecílie Jílková
@CecilieJilkova
·
11d
The statement and conversation involve a critique of journalistic practices and accusations of plagiarism or lack of originality. The tone is confrontational, with participants defending their work and questioning the integrity of others. The use of emojis and sarcastic remarks suggests a dismissive attitude.
- The conversation includes personal attacks and sarcasm, which can be harmful and do not promote constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The exchange does not respect the dignity of others, as it involves accusations and dismissive language. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The dialogue lacks constructive criticism and instead focuses on personal attacks, failing to engage in meaningful discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.