Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the potential economic impact of the AI industry, comparing it to historical economic bubbles. The tone is defensive, suggesting confidence in one's position despite criticism. The statement does not engage in personal attacks and focuses on the broader economic implications.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is part of a broader economic discussion. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by engaging with economic analysis, though it could be more detailed. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement avoids personal attacks and focuses on the economic argument. [+1]