House Press Gallery
@HouseDailyPress
·
2d
The statement criticizes the Speaker of the House for allegedly canceling votes and avoiding the swearing-in of Adelita Grijalva, which is claimed to be necessary for discharging the Epstein files. The tone is accusatory and suggests a lack of action on important issues, using the word 'pathetic' to express disdain.
- The statement uses a strong negative term 'pathetic,' which could be seen as harmful or disrespectful, but it does not contain hate speech or harassment. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does question the dignity of the Speaker by calling their actions 'pathetic.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a personal attack by labeling the Speaker's actions as 'pathetic' without offering a constructive alternative or engaging in dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by criticizing a public figure's actions, but it could be more responsible by avoiding personal attacks and focusing on the issue at hand. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.