Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89
10/4/2025, 5:47:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
3d
@faryus88 @WIRED @StevenLevy Levy article:
neil turkewitz
@neilturkewitz
·
3d
Did OpenAI pay for placing this article? Very disappointing. And this makes me mad: “In the days following launch, GPT-5 was looking like AI’s version of New Coke.” What a way to minimize the harms & risks posed by AI. Did New Coke threaten humanity? https://www.wired.com/story/sam-…
Farhan Yusuf
@faryus88
·
3d
@GaryMarcus @WIRED @StevenLevy Can you share the link to this piece?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
3d
The AI world has changed dramatically over the last few months. People like Altman used to dismiss me, and my skepticism, and get away with it. That dodge is no longer flying.

A new @Wired essay by @stevenlevy in which he confronts Altman makes that vivid:

“GPT-5 was the most

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning AI development and public perception of GPT-5, a large language model by OpenAI. The statement links to an article where OpenAI's CEO addresses criticisms and misunderstandings about GPT-5, contributing to the ongoing debate about AI's impact and risks.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement itself does not contain harmful language or actions, but it is part of a broader conversation that includes criticism and defense of AI technology.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By linking to an article that aims to clarify misunderstandings, the statement promotes understanding and potentially empathy towards the subject of AI. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement is part of a dialogue that includes criticism and defense, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to direct attention to a discussion about AI, which is a significant societal issue. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by sharing a link to an article that contributes to the public debate on AI, using the platform responsibly. [+1]