In reply to:
Spencer Andrews
@TruthIsLiberty4
·
5d
The statement engages in a public discourse by addressing the issue of protests and law enforcement in Portland, referencing statements from public officials and the general sentiment of the city's residents. It challenges the previous assertion about the reasons for federal presence in Portland, suggesting a different perspective based on local leadership and public opinion.
- The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on presenting a counter-argument based on public statements and opinions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by referencing multiple sources of authority and public opinion, though it could be more empathetic in tone. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by challenging the previous assertion with evidence from public figures and the community, avoiding personal attacks. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.