Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 89

The statement critiques the effectiveness of large-scale computing in achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI). It engages in public discourse by addressing the capabilities and limitations of AI technology. The tone is skeptical, suggesting that despite significant computational resources, AGI remains elusive.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and is a critique of technology, not individuals.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by discussing the limitations of current AI technology. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI development without personal attacks. [+1]