In reply to:
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
·
19h
David Manheim
@davidmanheim
·
19h
The conversation involves a discussion about the energy consumption of GPT-5, comparing it to the electricity usage of countries. The tone is analytical and critical, focusing on the accuracy of the energy consumption estimates and their implications.
- The statement does not cause harm and is part of a factual discussion about energy consumption. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by engaging in a discussion about the implications of AI energy usage. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the accuracy of the energy consumption estimates. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.