Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement is highly critical and accusatory, using strong language to express disagreement with Van Jones' alleged actions or statements. It accuses him of being complicit in a serious issue and questions his integrity.
- The statement violates the principle of doing no harm with words, as it uses harsh and inflammatory language. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of Van Jones, engaging in a personal attack. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, opting instead for an ad hominem attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.