Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -151
10/8/2025, 1:03:16 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
This means that the Biden family’s shakedown strategy was truly global and pursued hand-in-glove with the Chinese. Here’s background on their grift from the reporter who wrote one of the best books on the topic:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
346d
Ben Schreckinger is an old-fashioned investigative journalist with Politico who wrote the best book on Joe Biden. Schreckinger’s book is called, simply, The Bidens. Hachette published the book in 2021. “It got a fair amount of attention in the conservative press,” he told me
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
Wait wait it gets worse:

— “The deal was among several projects [!] in different parts of the world for which the joint venture discussed seeking [Chinese state owned] CEFC investment.”

— Hunter “Biden was involved in discussions about the structure of the joint venture, as
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
The lawyers for Hunter’s corrupt developer client first threatened to jeopardize the land upon which the embassy sat, and then proposed a deal whereby prosecutors dropped the case in exchange for the corrupt developer selling nearly half his stake to a state-owned Chinese energy
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
This appears to have been a straight-up mob-style shakedown by the Biden family done under the auspices of Obama foreign policy and in a way the directly jeopardized US national security.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
Mind-blowing. In 2014, VP Biden attacked corrupt developer in Romania who owned land around US embassy. In 2015, Hunter goes to work for the corrupt developer, lobbies US ambassador to pressure Romanians to drop case, then proposes to settle case by cutting in his China client 😳

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing alleged political scandals involving high-profile figures and institutions. It presents a narrative suggesting misconduct by the CIA, FBI, and political figures, aiming to influence public perception.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement potentially causes harm by making serious allegations without providing evidence, which could mislead or inflame public opinion. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It may violate privacy and dignity by making unverified claims about individuals and organizations, contributing to potential harassment or defamation. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations and conspiracy theories without fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks, undermining productive discourse. [-2]