Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -151
10/8/2025, 1:23:25 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
We sometimes think of Hillary and Biden's corruption as separate from the Russia Collusion hoax, but the full context reveals something even more sinister. Hillary as Sec of State approved uranium imports from Russia in exchange for $500k for her husband, ostensibly for a speech,
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
Shortly after this, the CIA and FBI created the Russia collusion hoax to frame Trump, in part to distract from the Clinton influence peddling scheme, and in part to hurt Trump.

This newly unearthed scandal raises the question of whether another goal was to distract from the
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
This means that the Biden family’s shakedown strategy was truly global and pursued hand-in-glove with the Chinese. Here’s background on their grift from the reporter who wrote one of the best books on the topic:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
346d
Ben Schreckinger is an old-fashioned investigative journalist with Politico who wrote the best book on Joe Biden. Schreckinger’s book is called, simply, The Bidens. Hachette published the book in 2021. “It got a fair amount of attention in the conservative press,” he told me
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
Wait wait it gets worse:

— “The deal was among several projects [!] in different parts of the world for which the joint venture discussed seeking [Chinese state owned] CEFC investment.”

— Hunter “Biden was involved in discussions about the structure of the joint venture, as
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
The lawyers for Hunter’s corrupt developer client first threatened to jeopardize the land upon which the embassy sat, and then proposed a deal whereby prosecutors dropped the case in exchange for the corrupt developer selling nearly half his stake to a state-owned Chinese energy
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
84d
This appears to have been a straight-up mob-style shakedown by the Biden family done under the auspices of Obama foreign policy and in a way the directly jeopardized US national security.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing alleged disinformation campaigns and political corruption involving public figures and institutions. It presents a critical view of the FBI, Aspen Institute, and media handling of the Hunter Biden laptop story, suggesting manipulation and brainwashing. The tone is accusatory and implies a conspiracy, which can influence public perception and trust in these entities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims, which may affect public trust in institutions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals involved, as it makes serious allegations without evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering suspicion and division. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It lacks constructive criticism and engages in personal attacks, particularly against public figures and institutions. [-2]