Robert Costa

The statement addresses a public issue concerning the relationship between Harvard and the Trump administration, particularly focusing on the implications of making deals with a government that may still target institutions or individuals for retribution. It raises questions about trust, governance, and the consequences of political actions, which are relevant to public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it highlights potential harm in political dealings.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on institutional actions rather than personal attacks.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement raises questions that could promote understanding of the complexities in political negotiations. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather presents a critical question about political strategy. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By questioning the implications of political actions, the statement could contribute to societal betterment by encouraging transparency and accountability. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by discussing a significant public issue responsibly. [+1]