In reply to:
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸
@Bubblebathgirl
·
37d
The statement questions the effectiveness of increased security measures in cities, suggesting skepticism about their impact on safety. It challenges the notion that safety has been restored and implies that criminals may simply avoid areas with visible security presence.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the effectiveness of security measures, which could be seen as constructive criticism.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes critical thinking by questioning the narrative of restored safety, encouraging a deeper understanding of the situation. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the effectiveness of security measures without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.