Wide Awake Media
@wideawake_media
·
124d
The statement expresses a strong opposition to digital IDs, framing them as tools for control by central authorities. It suggests that rejecting digital IDs is crucial to resisting broader globalist policies. The tone is assertive and somewhat alarmist, aiming to rally opposition against digital IDs.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by inciting fear and resistance without providing a balanced view. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect differing opinions or the potential benefits of digital IDs, focusing solely on negative aspects. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding for those who might support digital IDs for security or convenience reasons. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, instead using strong language to dismiss opposing views. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.