Ron DeSantis

Rank 26 of 47

Score 12

@GreenspansWager They are setting up to seek another bailout if the AI market corrects. AI (and the financial institutions on the hook) will be said to be Too Big to Fail.

10/12/2025, 6:34:57 PM

In reply to:

Greenspan’s Wager

@GreenspansWager

121d

@RonDeSantis Hey Gov, what are your thoughts on bank consolidation killing community banks?

This problem confronts what caused the 2016 MAGA movement, the big bank bailouts.

Now small business can’t form because community banks aren’t there and regional banks rarely do small business loans.

Ron DeSantis

@RonDeSantis

121d

Whether an amendment is “good” is in the eye of the beholder; some amendments that have been adopted over the years in FL would not be “good” in my judgment. The biggest flaw has been using the amendment process to enact policy changes that don’t belong in the constitution in

John Stevens

@johnstevenspbay

121d

@RonDeSantis Was the constitutional amendment requiring high speed rail a good idea? Just because We The People voted for it? Lawmaking by plebiscite is not always a “good” without leaders answering the hard questions. We’re a republic for a reason.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing potential financial bailouts related to the AI market and the broader implications of financial institutions being 'Too Big to Fail.' It connects to ongoing debates about bank consolidation and its impact on community banks and small businesses.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement raises concerns about potential financial bailouts, which could be seen as a cautionary stance aimed at preventing economic harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
By highlighting the issue of financial bailouts, the statement encourages awareness and understanding of economic policies and their societal impacts. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement critiques financial institutions and government actions without engaging in personal attacks, maintaining a focus on policy issues. [+1]