Ron DeSantis

Rank 26 of 47

Score 12

Reposted by Ron DeSantis

The Constitution prohibits discrimination based on race, which is why the Court is likely to find racial gerrymandering to be unconstitutional.

The Constitution says nothing about political gerrymandering, which is why the Court has found such claims to be non-justiciable (ie,

Grumpy Old Boomer

@Crankyoldboomer

117d

@RonDeSantis @oldladysagrouch I would posit that the constitutionality of any sort of gerrymandering be examined. We need a system that is completely impartial to draw the districts. Not totally sure as to how that would best be implemented but it needs be done.

10/14/2025, 3:29:12 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the constitutionality of gerrymandering, a significant public issue. It highlights the difference between racial and political gerrymandering in terms of constitutional interpretation and suggests the need for an impartial system to draw districts.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on legal interpretations and potential solutions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by explaining the constitutional basis for different types of gerrymandering and suggesting a need for impartiality. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by proposing a solution and acknowledging uncertainty about implementation. [+1]