Ron DeSantis

Rank 26 of 47

Score 12

Reposted by Ron DeSantis

The Constitution prohibits discrimination based on race, which is why the Court is likely to find racial gerrymandering to be unconstitutional.

The Constitution says nothing about political gerrymandering, which is why the Court has found such claims to be non-justiciable (ie,

Grumpy Old Boomer

@Crankyoldboomer

117d

@RonDeSantis @oldladysagrouch I would posit that the constitutionality of any sort of gerrymandering be examined. We need a system that is completely impartial to draw the districts. Not totally sure as to how that would best be implemented but it needs be done.

10/14/2025, 3:29:12 PM

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the constitutionality of racial and political gerrymandering, referencing the Supreme Court's role in addressing these issues. It suggests the need for an impartial system to draw districts, which is a substantive contribution to civic dialogue.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on legal and constitutional aspects rather than personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by explaining the difference between racial and political gerrymandering and the Court's stance on these issues. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive dialogue by suggesting a solution (impartial district drawing) without attacking individuals. [+1]