Jake Tapper

Rank 9 of 47

Score 129

Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅

Hegseth's 17 pages of new rules for media in the Pentagon are a mistake and upend over 80 years of American norms. The wide range of outlets refusing these rules - from the Washington Post to Newsmax and The Hill - show how indefensible these new rules are.

10/14/2025, 3:13:47 PM

The statement critiques new media rules in the Pentagon, suggesting they disrupt long-standing American norms. It highlights the broad opposition from various media outlets, indicating a significant public issue concerning media freedom and government transparency.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing policy rather than individuals, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of the Pentagon's new rules without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principle of free speech by advocating for media freedom and criticizing policies that may infringe upon it, using the platform responsibly. [+2]