In reply to:
Jamie
@Vector76
·
18h
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
18h
The statement engages in a discussion about the capabilities of AI, specifically large language models (LLMs), in writing coherent and original novels, in response to a broader conversation about AI's potential in creative fields. The tone is analytical and contributes to the debate on AI's limitations and potential in literature.
- The statement does no harm and is respectful in its critique of AI's capabilities, focusing on technical limitations rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by addressing specific challenges LLMs face in novel writing, contributing to a nuanced discussion about AI's role in creative writing. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages constructively with the previous comments, offering a reasoned perspective without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.