Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the political implications and governance style of a public figure, specifically former President Trump, and the role of his advisors in his administration. It reflects on the impact of his leadership and the warnings given by his advisors, which are relevant to public concerns about governance and political accountability.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it does critique a public figure's governance style, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in critique of a public figure's actions and the role of his advisors without resorting to personal attacks, focusing instead on political actions and implications. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss political issues, which is a responsible use of free speech, contributing to civic dialogue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.