Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47

Score -6

@MarisaACirrino If you want the federal government to enforce federal law, then by definition you are disturbed by how they are breaking it in Portland, Chicago and elsewhere

10/17/2025, 9:40:25 AM

In reply to:

Ray of Sunshine

@MarisaACirrino

27d

@marwilliamson I absolutely voted for the federal government to enforce federal law. The only war that was waged on innocent Americans was the Biden admin allowing 10-20 million unvetted illegals in this country.

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

27d

ICE agents are basically waging war on innocent people (including American citizens).
Are there still people saying, "This is what we elected them to do"?

The statement engages in a discussion about federal law enforcement and immigration policies, which are public issues. The tone is critical and challenges the previous statement by pointing out a perceived contradiction in the stance on federal law enforcement.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as confrontational, which may not fully align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in dialogue by challenging a viewpoint, which is a form of constructive criticism, but it could be more respectful in tone to avoid personal attacks.
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement uses the platform to engage in a public issue, which aligns with the principle of free speech, but the tone could be more responsible and respectful. [+1]