In reply to:
peaceloveprosperity₿
@degenmoongirl
·
27d
The statement is a sarcastic response questioning the understanding of civics by the user @degenmoongirl, who expressed support for a president's policies on safe and clean cities in response to a critique of ICE agents' actions. The tone is dismissive and implies a lack of knowledge on the part of the original commenter.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, it resorts to a personal attack by questioning the individual's education and understanding of civics, which is an ad hominem argument. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.