Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
10/17/2025, 10:07:17 AM
X
In reply to:
soshbill馃猡达笍
@soshbill
路
26d
@marwilliamson Meanwhile, we won't have a chance to elect anyone away from it. The DNC will look long and hard for more Trumps to elevate, while pushing more neoliberals down our throats to run against them.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
路
26d
In this and in so many ways, he is clarifying the ideals of this country but the very act of trashing them. We will learn from this. And one day we will be better for it. 5/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
路
26d
But that鈥檚 how much he doesn鈥檛 get it. The monuments in Washington DC are not grandiose, they are grand. And there鈥檚 a huge difference. Our monuments are powerful but in their own way humble - the very ideal we strove for before he got to town. 4/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
路
26d
He feels our monuments aren鈥檛 dressed up enough, just as he feels all the 24 karat gold in the oval office - looking more and more like the Kremlin every day - provides an imperial gloss to match our national importance. 3/he is clarifying.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
路
26d
This arch is in addition, of course to the $250 million ballroom that he is attaching to the White House. 2/
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
路
26d
The President has formally announced plants to build an arch, much like the Arc de Triomphe in Paris, on the other side of the bridge that connects the Lincoln Memorial to Arlington national Cemetery. 1/

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing political dynamics within the Democratic Party and the influence of the Democratic National Committee (DNC) on elections. It implies a critique of past electoral decisions and suggests a need for independent thinking among Democratic voters.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it implies criticism of past voter behavior, which could be seen as indirectly dismissive.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does imply a negative judgment on a group of voters.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue.聽[-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism and dialogue, focusing instead on a general critique of voter behavior.聽[-1]