In reply to:
peaceloveprosperity₿
@degenmoongirl
·
27d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the effectiveness of political leadership in managing crime and cleanliness in cities, which are public issues. The tone is critical and challenges the claims made by another user about the president's impact on city safety and cleanliness.
- The statement does not use harmful language but is critical of the president's actions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of the president's policies but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the outcomes of policies rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by questioning the effectiveness of political leadership, which is a responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.