In reply to:
Dr. Angela Rasmussen
@angie_rasmussen
·
7d
The statement involves a critique of a public figure's claim about adolescent health statistics. The tone is skeptical and challenges the validity of the claim by referencing a lack of research. The intent is to question the accuracy and motivation behind the statement made by the public figure.
- The statement aims to do no harm by questioning potentially misleading information. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on the claim rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging fact-checking and research. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive criticism by questioning the claim without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.