In reply to:
Slowly Boiled Frog 🏳️🌈
@davidcaryhart
·
7d
Dr. Angela Rasmussen
@angie_rasmussen
·
7d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing claims made by a public figure about adolescent health statistics. The conversation critiques the validity of these claims and calls for evidence from reputable sources.
- The statement challenges potentially harmful misinformation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The language used ('crackpottery' and 'pulled out of his ass') could be seen as disrespectful, violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- By questioning the validity of the claims, the statement promotes understanding and critical thinking. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but uses derogatory language, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.