Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -6
10/21/2025, 12:21:19 AM
X
In reply to:
Hersades1989
@hersades1989
·
17d
@marwilliamson I'm not really sure. I watched Federal buildings burning to the ground during the BLM riots. If it's for Federal protection, I'm all in.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
17d
@hersades1989 And you think that’s all that’s going on here?
Hersades1989
@hersades1989
·
17d
@marwilliamson Federal agents and property should be protected.

The statement 'Well, it’s not' is a brief response in a conversation about the protection of federal agents and property, and the context of BLM protests. It engages with a public issue, specifically the protection of federal property and the implications of protests, which are topics of public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but it is dismissive and lacks constructive engagement.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it is dismissive and does not provide further explanation or context. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is a brief dismissal without further elaboration or engagement with the opposing viewpoint. [-1]