Marianne Williamson

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score -5

The statement is a critical commentary on various societal and political issues, including economic exploitation, data privacy concerns, and political corruption. It reflects a tone of frustration and urgency, aiming to highlight perceived injustices and corruption associated with the Trump administration.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly in its accusations against specific individuals and groups, which may not fully align with the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but its accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful to the privacy and dignity of those it criticizes. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism and accusations without offering solutions or fostering dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it primarily consists of accusations and does not invite discussion or understanding from opposing viewpoints. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement attempts to use its influence to highlight perceived societal issues, which aligns with the principle of using influence for societal betterment, though it could be more constructive. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but could use its platform more responsibly by fostering dialogue and understanding rather than solely focusing on criticism.