Michael Schellenberger

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -62
10/22/2025, 2:27:35 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
@megynkelly @StuDoesAmerica @Congressman_JVD @NRDC @SierraClub Thank you @megynkelly and @Congressman_JVD !
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
@megynkelly @StuDoesAmerica @Congressman_JVD Truly unforgivable behavior. @nrdc @SierraClub and their enablers in the media should be ashamed of themselves.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
74d
The scientist, who has decades of experience researching the marine environments of the East Coast, said, “From my lab, I can see the turbines 20 miles from here at Revolution Wind. I’m familiar with the ocean in this area and have been out there a lot. It’s not uncommon for us
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
@megynkelly @StuDoesAmerica @Congressman_JVD They permitted an industrial wind project in an area that a top US government scientist called “a magical space” for sea life. This scandal reveals that environmental groups sold out science and nature for money and power.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
74d
“If you were to ask a marine mammal scientist where we shouldn’t put offshore wind energy, they would say this area,” said the scientist, referring to the Revolution Wind project. “It’s what we call a ‘magical space’ for marine animals. We have a dozen marine mammal species and
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
@megynkelly @StuDoesAmerica @Congressman_JVD Leaked study confirms that Biden administration broke the law:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
74d
Industrial wind energy doesn't kill whales, insisted the media. But a new report by a top government scientist reveals that the Biden admin. broke the law in approving Empire Wind, while Revolution Wind is in a crucial "magical space for marine animals" at risk of extinction.
Megyn Kelly
@megynkelly
·
18d
Karine Jean-Pierre Undermines Her Entire Book, Ghouls at "No Kings," and Wind Farm Danger, with @StuDoesAmerica and @Congressman_JVD

WATCH:

The statement criticizes Democrats and former President Obama for losing credibility on environmental issues and free speech, suggesting a failure in policy and leadership. The tone is accusatory and dismissive, aiming to highlight perceived shortcomings in environmental policy decisions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses strong language to criticize without providing constructive solutions or dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it engages in broad criticism without specific evidence or respectful discourse. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it focuses on blame rather than fostering dialogue or understanding. [-1]