Ron DeSantis

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 51
10/23/2025, 2:00:22 AM
X
In reply to:
Ron DeSantis
@RonDeSantis
·
95d
@morgan2060 Easier said than done given how ingrained the leftism has been in academia.
James Morgan
@morgan2060
·
95d
@RonDeSantis Not to take away from your accomplishments, you're awesome. However the bar is set so low all you need to do is NOT teach gender bullshit and teach actual classes and you will rank top 5 without effort. 😆
Ron DeSantis
@RonDeSantis
·
95d
And the Florida schools have — by far — the lowest in-state tuition, roughly $6300.

Plus, high-performing students can get full tuition scholarships via our Bright FuTures program.
Ron DeSantis
@RonDeSantis
·
95d
University of Florida ranked #1 college in America; Florida State ranked #7.

The Manhattan Institute's City Journal has devised a new methodology to rank colleges. This includes giving credit to colleges that perform well on issues — free speech, ideological pluralism,

The statement discusses educational reform in Florida, focusing on breaking up accreditation systems, terminating certain professors, and promoting merit. It suggests a need for effort and attention to detail in implementing these changes.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by suggesting the termination of 'activist professors,' which may not promote a respectful or inclusive environment. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of professors labeled as 'activist,' potentially engaging in a form of cyberbullying or harassment. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a divisive manner. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it targets a group of individuals rather than addressing specific policies or practices. [-1]