Marianne Williamson

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score -8
10/23/2025, 7:56:20 PM
X
In reply to:
Kari A Hammer, Ph.D.✨
@flow2evolve
·
9d
@marwilliamson Oh my goodness, Marianne. One of my biggest concerns as a woman is the erasure of woman which seems to be promoted through the democrat party with their gender non conformist policies. Erasing mother, woman, girl and replacing it with chest-feeder, and the generic term “person”
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
9d
Project 2025 includes among other things the Christian Nationalist erasure of anything that suggests the empowerment of women. Female submission is part of their worldview. The East Wing that was demolished was the hub of the First Ladies’s power. They did it for that reason.

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing societal issues related to gender identity and political policies. It responds to concerns about the erasure of women and gender non-conformist policies, suggesting that both political sides are problematic and equating erasure with submission.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm with words, but it could be interpreted as dismissive of gender non-conformist policies, which might indirectly harm those who support such policies. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it could be seen as lacking respect for the dignity of those who support gender non-conformist policies. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses both sides without offering a constructive path forward. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it lacks constructive criticism or dialogue, as it simply states that both sides are bad without further explanation or engagement.