The statement challenges the scientific consensus on climate change, specifically regarding sea level rise, and accuses scientists of misleading the public. It presents a controversial viewpoint that could influence public opinion on climate science.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading misinformation if the claims are not substantiated with credible evidence.
[-2]Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.It accuses scientists of deliberate misinformation, which could be seen as disrespectful and damaging to their reputations without clear evidence.
[-2]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a divisive claim without fostering constructive dialogue.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in a personal attack on scientists, which does not align with constructive criticism.
[-2]