In reply to:
Robert Gergely, MD
@rgergelymd
·
1d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
1d
The statement engages in public discourse by challenging the notion of 'normalcy' associated with Trump's leadership, questioning actions perceived as harmful or authoritarian. It critiques policies and actions related to federal agencies and the use of AI in a provocative manner.
- The statement uses strong language to criticize actions it perceives as harmful, which could be seen as a violation of striving to do no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech but uses provocative language that could be interpreted as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticizing and questioning the actions of others without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses rhetorical questions to challenge the opposing view without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.