Marianne Williamson

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score -4
10/25/2025, 7:40:45 AM
X
In reply to:
Cathy
@Sophie3906
·
1d
@Ronxyz00 Rand Paul and Thomas Massie both have the same disease: inability to see the forest for the trees. You can't take a broad policy and pick out one negative effect while ignoring all the positives, and then complain that because you found one negative effect it's a bad policy.
Ron Smith
@Ronxyz00
·
2d
Rand Paul calls out his GOP colleagues for blindly following Trump despite bad trade policies:

"China is not buying any of our soybeans this year. The tariff war with China has led to this. And they [GOP senators] don't have the guts because it's their president. And frankly

The statement is part of a public discourse about political figures and trade policies. It questions the focus on negative aspects of policies without considering positives, engaging in a broader discussion about policy evaluation.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and encourages a balanced view of policy evaluation. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by suggesting a comprehensive view of policy impacts. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the approach to policy analysis without personal attacks. [+1]