In reply to:
The statement engages with a public issue by discussing the implications of military funding and public sentiment towards military actions. It suggests a perspective on the relationship between the military and the general public, hinting at a potential misuse of military power to control civilians.
- The statement does not directly harm others but implies a negative view of public sentiment, which could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and compassion, as it generalizes public apathy and suggests a cynical view of military-civilian relations. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not use influence for societal betterment, as it promotes a divisive perspective. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does not use the platform responsibly, as it could incite distrust without evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.