Michael Schellenberger

Rank 36 of 47
|
Score -62

The statement claims that scientists and the media have deliberately misled the public about climate change, suggesting a conspiracy involving disinformation. It challenges the credibility of scientific consensus and media reporting on climate issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could potentially cause harm by undermining trust in scientific research and media reporting, which are crucial for informed public decision-making. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It accuses scientists and journalists of deliberate deception, which could be seen as disrespectful and potentially defamatory without substantial evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a divisive narrative without engaging with the scientific community's perspectives. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it makes broad accusations without inviting discussion or presenting evidence. [-2]