In reply to:
Dr. Matthew M. Wielicki
@MatthewWielicki
·
12d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
13d
The statement and conversation engage in public discourse by discussing the integrity of scientific claims about climate change, a significant public issue. The tone is accusatory, suggesting a deliberate misrepresentation by scientists.
- The statement potentially causes harm by accusing scientists of deliberate misinformation without presenting evidence in the statement itself. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the privacy and dignity of scientists by implying misconduct without detailed evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it presents a one-sided accusation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on accusations rather than engaging with the scientific community for clarification. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.