Reposted by Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib
More Perfect Union
@MorePerfectUS
·
4d
The statement criticizes the Trump administration's decision not to use SNAP contingency reserves, which are intended to support Americans in need. It engages with public issues related to government policy and social welfare, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather highlights a policy decision, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By bringing attention to the potential impact on 42 million Americans, the statement promotes understanding and empathy for those affected by the policy. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques a policy decision without engaging in personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a significant societal issue, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement responsibly uses free speech to discuss a public policy issue, upholding the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.