Reposted by Robert Costa
The statement reports on a political figure, Gavin Newsom, advising small donors to cease contributions to a redistricting measure, indicating confidence in its outcome. It touches on public discourse as it involves political strategy and public policy related to redistricting.
- The statement does not use harmful language or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on political strategy without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is neutral in tone.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in criticism or dialogue, but it does not attack anyone personally. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement reflects the use of influence in political strategy, but it does not explicitly aim for societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform responsibly, reporting on political strategy with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.