In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
8d
The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing alleged government actions related to internet censorship, a significant public issue. The tone suggests a critical stance towards these actions, implying secrecy and potential overreach.
- The statement may cause harm by potentially spreading misinformation if the claims are not substantiated. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as engaging in sensationalism, which might not fully respect the dignity of those involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence to support claims, which could be seen as a personal attack on the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness of a public issue, but the approach may not contribute positively to societal betterment if not based on verified information.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.