Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing alleged censorship activities involving a prominent university and international officials. It raises concerns about transparency and legality, suggesting a potential violation of free speech principles.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement may cause harm by potentially spreading unverified claims, which could damage reputations. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It challenges the privacy and dignity of the individuals and institutions involved by implying wrongdoing without clear evidence. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead makes accusatory claims. [-1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about a significant issue, but the approach may not be responsible if the claims are unverified. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement touches on free speech issues, but the accusatory tone may undermine responsible discourse.