Michael Schellenberger

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -71
Ramblings of a Filipino Nerd
@RamblingsNerd
·
4d
Even putting aside how rather damning the leaked documents are, it's worth remembering that not only is Julie Imran Grant NOT Australian at all, but that she refused an offer from the CIA because she thought they were too RESTRICTIVE.
10/30/2025, 12:46:56 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
4d
@mattjcan Even Australian senators can’t get a straight answer as to why an American, who says she was recruited by the CIA, is their nation’s top censor.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
559d
CIA RECRUIT IS PURSUING GLOBAL INTERNET CENSORSHIP AS "E-SAFETY" CZAR IN AUSTRALIA

American–born Julie Inman Grant is a key architect of the multigovernmental “Global Online Safety Regulators Network” to censor the speech that politicians and government bureaucrats fear.

X
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
Thank you Senator @mattjcan for raising the alarm about the disturbing and unexplained role of Australia’s top “eSafety” censor, Julie Inman-Grant, in secretly coordinating global censorship with UK, EU, Brazil, and Stanford Cyber Policy Center.
Senator Matt Canavan
@mattjcan
·
5d
Our eSafety Commissioner has lost multiple court cases which reveal that she has been acting beyond the boundaries that the Parliament set for her.

Now the US Congress is concerned that her actions are limiting the First Amendment rights of Americans.

It is time for a proper
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
5d
In the wake of our reporting that Stanford, EU, UK, Brazil, and Australia are involved in a secret global censorship effort, Australian @SenatorAntic took to the floor of the Senate to demand answers. Why is Australia's top "eSafety" censor demanding total global censorship?
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
6d
In 2022, Obama gave a speech at Stanford Cyber Policy Center advocating sweeping censorship of the Internet. Now, Public has discovered the same Center last month hosted a secret meeting with EU, UK, Brazil, & Australia officials to plot global censorship — including of the US.

The statement and its context involve a discussion about global internet censorship and the role of various international figures and organizations. It raises concerns about transparency, accountability, and the implications for free speech, which are significant public issues.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement raises concerns about potential harm caused by censorship, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The discussion respects privacy but questions the actions of public figures, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of potential global censorship efforts. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the actions of public figures and organizations without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]