The statement argues for merit pay in schools, suggesting that principals should determine teacher rewards. It presents this view as 'common sense,' implying simplicity and self-evidence.
- The statement does not directly harm but could be seen as dismissive of opposing views.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It lacks empathy by not considering the complexities and potential impacts on teachers. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses alternative perspectives as lacking common sense. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.