Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
-5
Rep. Nancy Mace
@RepNancyMace
·
5d
The statement is a response to a public figure's tweet about an incident at an airport involving policy changes and alleged misconduct. It engages with a public issue related to transparency and accountability of public institutions, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses a dismissive tone ('Oh my god') which could be seen as undermining the seriousness of the issue, potentially causing harm by trivializing the concerns raised. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as disrespectful to the dignity of the person involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a dismissive and sarcastic tone, which could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, as it dismisses the issue rather than engaging with it constructively. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.