Jake Tapper

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 142

The statement addresses a public issue regarding government funding for SNAP during a shutdown, suggesting a change in policy by the Trump administration. It implies criticism of the current administration's decision-making, particularly in relation to food security during a government shutdown.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by suggesting that the administration's decision leads to people going hungry, which could be seen as a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticizing the administration's decision without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of the administration's actions, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism. [-1]