Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques Jensen Huang and OpenAI, suggesting they are seeking a federal AI bailout and are motivated by greed. It implies skepticism about their intentions and actions in the context of AI development and investment.
- The statement uses strong language like 'grifters' which could be considered harmful and disrespectful, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use derogatory language that could undermine the dignity of the individuals involved. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks by labeling individuals as 'grifters.' [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not appear to use influence for societal betterment, as it focuses on criticizing individuals rather than addressing broader societal issues constructively. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it resorts to name-calling rather than reasoned argument. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.