Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the potential bailout of OpenAI and NVidia, critiquing the notion of 'too big to fail' in the context of national security and economic policy. It suggests that other companies could fill the gap if OpenAI fails, challenging the necessity of government intervention.
- The statement does not directly harm others but could be seen as dismissive of the potential consequences of a company's failure.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on corporate actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it takes a firm stance without exploring the complexities of the issue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of government policy and corporate actions but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to question government policy and corporate practices, potentially contributing to public debate. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing a critical opinion on a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.