Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement references a news article discussing a significant political controversy involving public figures and organizations, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is critical and highlights internal conflict within a political party and a think tank.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a contentious issue, which could be seen as necessary for public awareness.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and organizations involved in a public controversy.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does bring attention to a significant public issue.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather reports on a public controversy, allowing for potential constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by discussing a public issue responsibly, linking to a reputable news source. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.