Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement is a call to action urging people to contact their congressional representatives regarding the perceived prioritization of corporate bailouts over social welfare programs. It critiques the government's potential financial support for large tech companies, suggesting a misalignment of priorities, especially in the context of international competition with China. The statement engages with public issues such as government spending, corporate influence, and social welfare, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not use harmful language but rather critiques government actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and awareness of government priorities, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of government actions without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to encourage civic engagement and awareness of societal issues, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using its platform to discuss public issues, aligning with the principle of responsible use of free speech. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.