Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement engages in public discourse by commenting on the potential economic and geopolitical implications of large language models (LLMs) and their perceived importance. It suggests skepticism about future narratives that might justify financial bailouts for LLMs, framing it as a prediction about public and governmental responses.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of potential future actions, maintaining a neutral tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critique.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning future narratives without resorting to personal attacks.Β [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about potential issues in AI policy and economic decisions.Β [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing potential future actions and narratives.Β [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.